Our Judge, Mr Peter Bland, has emerged from the mountain of words that three hundred and thirty seven poems create. He was delighted by the opportunity that ‘as a whole renewed his belief in the diversity of possibilities that poetry offer, and reminds him how poetry expresses the nature of things, it doesn’t explain them.’ ( A sneaky wee teaser from his report.)
And, yes, results are in.
We are in the process of contacting the four prize getters. In the meantime all the poems are with Joanna (our poetry editor). She is reading her way through the poems and selecting possibles for publication. (That’s two bites of the apple and just another example of how fab our competitions are!)
If you do not hear from us by 1 December you can safely send your work elsewhere. I urge you to do this. Remember art is subjective.
While I have your attention:
Please heed the call to keep a bo-peep on the blog.
Over the next week or so I will be revealing an exciting new competition. Yes, another innovation from your forward thinking and dedicated Board.
It is something meaty to get your teeth into as your end of year worries are blowin’ in the wind. Till then, enjoy the long weekend.
2016 Poetry competition is now closed and following on from Joanna’s blog: I’m singing the praises of poets.
What an outstanding effort:
Three hundred and thirty seven (337) poems have been subjected to a rigorous administrative procedure (can’t divulge sensitive details, but a hot soak and a few peeled grapes will go along way to restore my equilibrium). They have been parceled and are now winging their way, via pigeon post, to our judge. When I told him how many poems to expect, he was absolutely delighted and can’t wait to read them all.
As for the results, they will be published on the website in December, when the next issue of the magazine comes out. All poems entered into the competition will be considered for publication, and any selections notified by the end of November. Please note that all poems entered are free to be sent out elsewhere after 1 December 2016.
Thank you all for your entries and I wish each and every one of you the very best for the competition. Take care and keep writing.
We, my consulting editor and I, have been overwhelmed by the response from NZ writers for this first online issue – regulars and new faces. The longer word count has been welcomed by writers, with high quality work coming in. Since the online issue is the only forum for these, we feel we need to give priority to the best of the longer works, holding over equally good shorter stories for the print December issue. I hope this won’t disappoint anyone too much. Who’d want to be an editor? And we do it for love – of writing.